ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04957 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His uncharacterized service be changed to honorable. 2. His reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 12 June 2012, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s request that his uncharacterized service be changed to honorable. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit F. In an application dated 11 February 2014, the applicant seeks reconsideration of his earlier request. In addition, he request his RE code of “2C” changed. He states that he served in the Air Force and successfully completed Basic Military Training (BMT) and continued to technical school until he was notified that he was being recommended for an entry level separation. He was informed that he was not able to function effectively in a military environment. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: In an earlier finding, the Board determined there was insufficient evidence to warrant any corrective action. After thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in support of this appeal and the evidence of record, we do not believe the applicant has overcome the rationale expressed in the previous decision. Therefore, we do not find the additional evidence presented is sufficient to warrant the relief sought on that basis. Regarding the applicant’s request that his character of service and RE code be changed – we note that based on his entry level separation, both his uncharacterized service and RE code of 2C is correct in accordance with AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the USAF. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to recommend favorable consideration of the applicant’s request. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-04957 in Executive Session on 24 March 2015, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 26 June 2012, w/atchs. Exhibit G. DD Form 149, dated 11 February 2014, w/atchs.